| Municipal Police Forces | Other Agencies | ||||||||||||||||||
| Abbotsford | Central Saanich | Delta | GVTA | Kitasoo | Nelson | New West | Oak Bay | Port Moody | Saanich | Stl'atl'imx Tribal Police | Vancouver | Victoria | West Vancouver | Corrections | RCMP | Sheriffs | |||
| Part | Standard | ||||||||||||||||||
| A1.2.1 | Written policy recognizes that the authority for the use of force is found in the Criminal Code. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||
| A1.2.2 | Written policy governs discharge of warning shots.1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||||||
| A1.2.3 | Written policy governs the carrying of firearms, ammunition, and other weapons while off duty. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | ||||||
| A1.2.4 | Written policy governs the use and control of weapons and ammunition issued by the department (note: includes weapons other than firearms).2 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| A1.2.5 | Written policy establishes procedures for firearms and weapons inspections, and replacement of ammunition. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| A1.2.6 | Written policy requires that only officer trained and demonstrating proficiency in the use of department authorized firearms or weapons be allowed to | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| carry and use such firearms or weapons (note: intended to cover use of any weapon). | |||||||||||||||||||
| A1.2.7 | Written policy requires each officer to qualify at least annually with any firearm or other weapon that the officer is authorized to use (note: policy should also describe the qualifications required).3 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||||||||||
| A1.2.8 | Written policy requires that only firearms, ammunition, and other weapons authorized by the Chief Constable be used in the performance of duty. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||||||
| A1.2.9 | Written policy requires that a written report be submitted whenever an officer, or other employee: | ? 6 | |||||||||||||||||
| ● Takes action that results in injury or death of another person, including the officer or any other officer. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||||
| ● Applies force through the use of a weapon. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| ● Discharges a firearm other than in training. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | ||||||
| ● Applies force by any means, other than routine handcuffing or low levels of restraint. | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | |||||||
| A1.2.10 | Written policy includes procedures for reviewing incidents in which an officer applies force by means of a weapon or firearm, lateral neck restraint, or the | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | ||||
| application of force, by any means, other than routine handcuffing or low-level restraint and compliance.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A1.2.11 | Written policy establishes criteria concerning the assignment of an officer whose use of force results in a death or grievous bodily harm.5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||
| A1.2.12 | Written policy requires that only officers trained and demonstrating proficiency in applying the lateral neck restraint are authorized to apply this technique. | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | ? 6 | |||
| A1.2.13 | Written policy requires each officer authorized to apply the lateral neck restraint, to qualify at least annually in applying this technique. | √ | √ | ? 6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ? 6 | ? 6 | ? 6 | ||||||
| Source: Police Services Division, Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, Victoria, BC. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1 In the context of CEWs, warning shots may consist of CEW "sparking." However, the legislative requirement may not have intended that this provision apply to CEWs. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Thus, most policies may contain provisions related to warning shots from firearms, but none contain provisions related to “warning shots” from CEWs. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2 This is a very general provision that is easily satisfied in policy by widely divergent provisions. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 Some jurisdictions specify re-certification periods longer than one year. No agencies list qualification standards in policy, though Nelson policy refers to (but does | |||||||||||||||||||
| not list) the standards established by the Provincial Use of Force Coordinator. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 4 The checkmarked agencies require review in these circumstances, but policy is not always explicit as to the procedures to be followed during a review, and | |||||||||||||||||||
| provisions related to review vary between agencies . | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5 Policies do not establish this criteria, but simply note that reassignment will be based on “established criteria.” | |||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Provision may be contained in another departmental policy that the Braidwood Commission has not received (the Commission was only provided with conducted | |||||||||||||||||||
| energy weapons policies). | |||||||||||||||||||