| 5. MULTIPLE OR PROLONGED DEPLOYMENTS | |||||||||||||||||
| Municipal Police Forces | Other Agencies | ||||||||||||||||
| Abbotsford | Central Saanich | Delta | Kitasoo | Nelson | New West | Oak Bay | Port Moody | Saanich | Stl'atl'imx Tribal Police | Transit Authority Police | Vancouver | Victoria | West Van | Corrections | RCMP | Sheriffs | |
| General concerns | |||||||||||||||||
| The application of the CEW is a physically stressful event. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Continuous exposure risks. When practical, avoid prolonged or continuous exposure(s) to the CEW device's electrical discharge. In some circumstances, | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||
| in susceptible people, it is conceivable that the stress and exertion of extensive repeated, prolonged, or continuous application(s) of the CEW device may | |||||||||||||||||
| contribute to cumulative exhaustion, stress, and associated medical risk(s). (TI v.14) | |||||||||||||||||
| Tests show that there are no adverse effects on heart function or respiration deriving from multiple or prolonged deployments. (TI v.14) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||||
| CEW applications directly across the chest may cause sufficient muscle contractions to impair normal breathing patterns. While this is not a significant concern for | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||
| short (5-sec.) exposure, it may be a more relevant concern for extended duration applications. (TI v.12, v.13) | |||||||||||||||||
| Prolonged application of CEW may affect breathing as subjects generally do not breathe during cycles. | √ | √ | |||||||||||||||
| Current human studies have concluded that CEW applications directly across the chest do not impair normal breathing patterns. (TI v.14) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||
| Although existing studies on conscious human volunteers indicate subjects continue to breathe during extended CEW device applications, it is conceivable that the | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||
| muscle contractions may impair a subject's ability to breathe. (TI v.14) | |||||||||||||||||
| The TASER M26 was applied directly to the chest of experimental animals without causing heart failure during tests at the University of Missouri. | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| Using “worst case” scenarios, cardiac safety experts found no induction by the TASER M26 of abnormal heart rhythms. | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| No arrhythmia provocation occurred even when animals were given stimulant drugs epinephrine and isoproternol, which make the heart more susceptible to electrical stimulation. | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| Protocol for multiple deployment | |||||||||||||||||
| Avoid
extended or repeated CEW device applications where practicable. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) |
√ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Do not hold the trigger continuously beyond the 5-second cycle. | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| Three distinct cycles is the maximum before transitioning to a new force option. | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| The CEW operator should use an additional 5-second cycle if the subject resists, and can anticipate a second or third application. (TI v.12) | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| The decision to cycle the CEW must be based on situational factors. | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| Although there is no predetermined limit to the number of cycles that can be administered to the subject, officers should only apply the number of cycles | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| reasonably
necessary to allow them to safely approach and restrain the subject. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Officers should only apply the number of cycles reasonably necessary to allow them to safely restrain the subject. | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| If circumstances require extended duration or repeated discharges, the operator should take care to observe the breathing patterns of the subject and provide | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| breaks in the CEW stimulation when practicable. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) | |||||||||||||||||
| Dual CEW exposures (occurring for example when two officers were unaware that the other’s CEW was being deployed): if both applications occur on the upper | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| body, officers are to limit exposures to a maximum of three, because breathing issues can be compounded by chest contractions. | |||||||||||||||||
| Allow gaps between the cycles and avoid long continuous cycles. | √ | √ | |||||||||||||||
| If a third cycle is required, consider another force option. | √ | √ | |||||||||||||||
| Do not fire the CEW for more than 10 full 5-second cycles in a 10-minute period. | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| Due to the risk of overheating and to preserve the life of training weapons, the TASER M26 should be limited to a maximum of 10 back-to-back 5-second | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||
| cycles during training. This limitation does not apply to field use. The TASER X26 does not overheat and no training restrictions apply. (TI v.13, v.14) | |||||||||||||||||
| If a drive-stun is not effective at first instance, officers may consider an additional cycle. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| If drive-stun is not effective, evaluate location, consider an additional cycle to a different pressure point, or consider alternative force options. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||