| 14.
CEW HANDLING (WHILE ON DUTY) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Municipal Police Forces |
Other Agencies |
| |
Abbotsford |
Central Saanich |
Delta |
Kitasoo |
Nelson |
New West |
Oak Bay |
Port Moody |
Saanich |
Stl'atl'imx Tribal Police |
Transit Authority Police |
Vancouver |
Victoria |
West Van |
Corrections |
RCMP |
Sheriffs |
| TASER International training outlines pros and cons of holstering as follows (with instruction to
refer to own policy): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Support-side pros include lower risk of drawing wrong weapon
under stress, hip cross draw allows for faster engagement on the target, and
easier identification as a |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
| CEW
by other officers; a con is that there are weapon retention issues depending
on training. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) |
| A
dominant-side-carry pro is weapon retention; a con is that there is a higher
risk of weapon confusion, and there are three known incidents of shootings by
mistaken weapon. (TI v.12, v.13, v.14) |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
√ |
√ |
| Materials recommend non-firearm-side holstering. |
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
√ |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|